While reading all mails I got some more questions and comments:
On 02/16/2017 01:02 PM, Giannis Konstantinidis wrote:
> * Can someone from FAmSCo inform us about the current proposed
> solution? I have some vague idea, but as there are many discussions,
> I don't want to write anything wrong or outdated info here.
We are applying method #2 of filling vacant seats as mentioned in
the FAmSCo election rules. There have been three (3) candidates
nominated by FAmSCo members: fredlima and the following two (2)
runner-ups, gnokii and mitizie. FAmSCo members are currently voting
for their candidate of choice.
So Council told FAmSCo to do so? I'd prefer a voting with all remaining
candidates from last election and fredlima (as we do not know who would
have the most votes every candidate should get the opportunity). And:
Wouldn't a voting with all people who were allowed to vote @elections be
(In theory as we do not know the real distribution of votes without
fredlima, a complete new election would be the cleanest solution *IMHO*,
but thats something like taking a sledgehammer to crack a nut for me)
> * And… Please inform us ambassadors about the topic and all
> I got the information trough some IRC discussion… From this
> discussions I know that also some other ambassadors (who are not
> candidates, so they are "unaffected") are unhappy with that topic.
> That's everything for now. And again: Be friends and a friendly
> community ;)
You may track the process by viewing ticket #418 on the FAmSCo trac
I'm following that now. Btw. as fedorahosted will be shut down soon:
When will the switch to pagure happen?