Thomas Chung wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:52:53 -0500 (EST), Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote
> OK, so I'm not the only idiot.
>
> "What we have here is failure to communicate" -- especially since neither
> Roger, nor Alex, nor myself were present.
>
> /me mutters about getting a good iCal up somewhere...
>
> --g
Despite all, we had a good meeting. At least two of our SC members were present. :)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Meetings/2006-01-12
--
Thomas Chung
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung
--
Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
Fedora-ambassadors-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
With so much confusion, we might have enough people show up for a second
successful meeting. ;-)
It looks like I'm at least partially to blame for all of the confusion.
It seems this meeting *should* have been later, to maintain the
rotation, and I should have caught that. Ah, well.
If we can get something solid with scheduling going, I may come up with
an automated way to do the meeting reminders. I could get them out a
bit further in advance and with less risk of confusion.
--
Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes
nman64(a)n-man.com
http://www.n-man.com/
--
Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance!
http://rate.affero.net/nman64/