On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar@ispbrasil.com.br> wrote:
your proposal is good for Fedora, but probably not for ambassadors, you're seeking from improvements from ambassadors side, but I am not seeing any real improvements from Fedora side.

I'm not sure I follow your meaning here... can you elaborate on what you mean by this statement?  Is there something in particular you don't think is helpful for the ambassadors?  Is there something in particular you'd like improved on the Fedora side?
I had the same problems now that we had 10+ years ago.

Just like programming is an iterative process, fixing policy and procedure is often an iterative process as well.  Please don't think that the Mindshare Committee intends these to be the final version of things.  I, for one, simply see them as the "next step" in an iterative process that will change (and hopefully improve!) over time.