TL;DR: Option B
I will explain the origin of this initiative.
The main idea for country specific groups were to have the specific stats per country.
Nothing else.
At that moment, we wanted to know how fast and the trend of having new contributors on
each LATAM country.
Right now this is not used, and does not add value to the Project. This represent a
backdoor on other processes, so all the country specific groups should be removed and we
have to look for another method to gather the stats (get it from FAS info, for instance).
In that sense, this should be helpful for every country and add value to the Project.
Regards!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 18, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:10:20PM -0600, William Moreno wrote:
>> B)
>> 1 - suggest deletion of all these groups
>>
>>
>> Maybe a big fedora-latam group, are you sure that the membership of these
>> groups grant access to all the Fedora infra? I am almost sure fedora-ni do
>> not grant any privilege
>
> I believe that if we are sticking to B, a big fedora-latam group would
> end up facing the same issues as the regional groups and would still
> have no purpose. FAS has support for including your location, so believe
> we could use that + datagrepper or meeting logs information if we want
> to know who are the active contributors in each region, if we do want
> that kind of information.
>
> About membership granting access: It does grant the same access as being
> on fedora-ambassador. fedora-ni most likely does the same: all the
> things I listed, as ssh access to fedora people, email alias and wiki
> editing privileges just requires the user to be in another group other
> than CLA (i.e, CLA+1).
>
> --
> Athos Ribeiro
>
>
http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr
> _______________________________________________
> ambassadors mailing list -- ambassadors(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ambassadors-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org