O/H Francesco Ugolini έγραψε:
Mirjam Wäckerlin ha scritto:
> Chitlesh and I we created the draft for Fedora European Infrastructure
> with the help of some people on #fedora-mktg.
> The Page still needs a lot of work, add your constructive comments and
> proposals on:
>
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Drafts/Europe
>
> This is the first draft as a result of the discussions at fosdem 2007.
>
> This draft should be completed and hopefully someone will step in for
> the post as the Fedora European Executive before LinuxTag 2007 Berlin.
Excellent! I think that the base is perfect, now we have to work to
develop this draft with the help of ALL European Ambassadors and all
Ambassadors interested.
I have a "little" question: Will he be a permanent Coordinator? If yes,
i agree, because i think that it's necessary continuity to make a work
well, not only, he would be a reference point to all Ambassadors. (In my
opinion a Central Europe's Ambassador would be perfect, because the big
events are there).
Best thing would be to have a Steering Committee instead of one person, and find
a way these persons be chosen under meritocracy [1].
To ensure continuity, in the recent Docs elections, the four top vote receivers
serve on FDSCo for a larger period of time (say, 12 months) than the next three
vote receivers (6 months). This way we make sure active members on the FDSCo but
also a continuity of involvement. Maybe this is a good idea for a FEuSCo (Fedora
Europe Steering Committee).
I suggest we expand on the Draft to have a much clearer image on what the
proposal actually proposes. As I noted in Chitlesh's talk, Europe has some very
important characteristics (locality, multilinguality, different laws) that we
should make sure the new "Fedora Office" will strategically address.
Is there a compelling reason we should rush to do it before Linuxtag '07?
-d
[1]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy
--
Dimitris Glezos
Jabber ID: glezos(a)jabber.org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
http://dimitris.glezos.com/
"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
--