On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:10 PM, inode0 <inode0@gmail.com> wrote:
 
  - inode0 proposes that we sponsor the Utah Open Source Conference either
    with remaining Q2 funds or if that isn't possible with Q3 funds and
    this is approved after herlo explains in some detail what is happening
    this year at UTOSC

      http://2009.utosc.com

Sorry I was unable to "attend" last night's meeting -- my ancient Dell wouldn't play nice with quaid's wireless and our girls had an appointment I promised them at the Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk.

Had I been there, I'd have emphasized my support that we sponsor UTOSC with both Q2 funds, if they exist, and Q3 funds, if necessary. While it's great to get new fests like NM going, it's also important that we keep established fest healthy as well.

[Good thing I was unable to get on IRC last night, perhaps: It spared all of you the stump speech about how RMS holds fests hostage by insisting they be "GNU/Linux" fests by his mere presence. This opinion comes from yours truly alone, Member No. 5030 of the FSF.]

Larry Cafiero