On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Max Spevack <mspevack(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009, inode0 wrote:
> Perhaps we can address some of the more cosmetic suggestions made in this
> thread as well. These are all very minor things. I can write up a new
> proposed wiki page but I think making these changes is something FAmSCo can
> approve or not for future elections without any big fuss.
This seems like a good idea to me. Let's get a proposal up, have some
conversation, and eventually come to something that FAMSCO can +1 but that
will be able to satisfy two sets of people:
(1) The people who don't have any issue with the current FAMSCO elections --
we want to make sure that we don't create new problems.
(2) The people who have suggestions about how we can improve things -- we
want to make sure that we are addressing concerns.
I also think that once we +1 something, we should also agree that we won't
revisit the issue for 2 elections, so that we can make the reforms needed,
and then move on to other things.
My proposed changes are reflected here now.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/SteeringCommittee/Election/Rules
Really the changes I've suggested are very very minor. I want the
discussion of matters of timing to be less specific so that scheduling
the general elections can be done smoothly without worrying about the
specific details of X has to he 2 days before Y for the FAmSCo
election and so on. I propose that we keep nominations on the wiki in
the order they were made and I reworded a couple of things without
changing any substance.
If there are any questions please feel free to ask.
John