+1 ... I second this
Regards
Onyeibo
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 21:54 +0300, Arthur Buliva wrote:
+1. Just what I was thinking but Jiri put it better. I agree with
this
proposition
On 11 Mar 2014 17:07, "Jiri Eischmann" <eischmann(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Jiri Eischmann píše v Út 25. 02. 2014 v 11:07 +0100:
> Hi,
> yesterday we had a long discussion about whether we want to
have a
> mechanism to remove completely inactive ambassadors or not.
This issue
> is brought up again and again, so I think it's time to
discuss it
> properly and eventually make a decision.
>
> You can find more in this ticket:
>
https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/358
>
> Feel free to comment (ideally in the ticket to keep all
discussion
> there), express your opinion, propose modifications, or even
different
> solutions. You input is welcome.
>
> Jiri
Hi,
I'm bringing an update on this issue. Based on the discussion
in this
mailing list and in the ticket, we decided that any manual
process for
removing "inactive" ambassadors is a no-go.
Pingou of Fedora Infra offered us a tool that would help us
achieve what
we originally wanted to achieve.
The combination of FAS logs and datagrepper (that covers
attending IRC
meetings, using tracs, sending emails to mailing lists, voting
in Fedora
elections, writing blogposts in FP,...) can identify
ambassadors who
haven't had any sign of online activity for the given time
period (in
FAmSCo we agreed on 18 months, but it's still open) and may
not be
interested in the project any more.
Those ambassadors would be notified by email that their
account is going
to be flagged as inactive in e.g. 14 days. To avoid it, they
can just
log in to FAS and they're fine for another 18 months.
I'd like to emphasize that no one is going to lose ambassador
membership. If someone meets the criteria and doesn't react to
the
notification message his/her account will just be flagged as
inactive
and his/her name won't be in the public list of ambassadors,
but he/she
will keep the membership and can become active again just by
logging in
to FAS and changing the status to active any time after the
deadline.
It's not meant to judge someone's activity, it's more like "we
haven't
seen you around online for some time, give us a wave if you're
still
interested in the project".
In FAmSCo, we agreed this is a non-invasive solution with
pretty much no
additional bureaucracy that would solve the problem. But we'd
again like
to know your opinion.
Jiri
--
ambassadors mailing list
ambassadors(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ambassadors