I agree :)

On 27 Feb 2014 18:28, "Jiri Eischmann" <eischmann@redhat.com> wrote:
Pierre-Yves Chibon píše v Čt 27. 02. 2014 v 15:57 +0100:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:33:00PM +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> > inode0 píše v Čt 27. 02. 2014 v 07:52 -0600:
> > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Jukka Palander <jukka@devspain.com> wrote:
> > Originally, we wanted to use some automated mechanism such as checking
> > the last time stamp when the ambassador logged into FAS. Because if you
> > haven't logged into FAS for, say, 2 years you're not probably around the
> > project any more. If you met such a condition all that would happen to
> > you would be an "inactive" flag that would remove you from the public
> > list of ambassadors, but you would remain a member of the ambassadors
> > group, and you could change the flag back to "active" any time.
> > Unfortunately our infra don't log such information.
>
> That's actually not true, we do keep info on what someone last logged into FAS.
>
> Maybe I could gather some numbers a little like I did for packagers:
> http://blog.pingoured.fr/index.php?post/2013/12/18/Fedora-packagers-activity
>
> I could use datagrepper and FAS and that should be pretty simple to do :)

That would be splendid!
I spoke with Patrick about it he told me the infra didn't keep such
info.

IMHO the cleanest solution would be to notify people who haven't logged
in for more than 2 years (or any other period we agree on) and tell them
they're currently flagged as inactive, but they can easily change in
their FAS account administration. They wouldn't lose the membership,
they would just not be listed in the public list, and they would be just
a few clicks from being considered active again.
We would avoid any process hassle, fights, and heated blood.

Jiri


--
ambassadors mailing list
ambassadors@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ambassadors