On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Kushal Das <kushaldas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 28/03/16, P J P wrote:
> On Monday, 28 March 2016 9:10 AM, "pravin.d.s(a)gmail.com" wrote:
> >Got one more reply from Huiren Wo. One thing is clear no one is
> > happy with present time, all 8 respondant are not available on
> > Sat 9:30-10:30 IST.
> >So as PJP suggested we definitely need new time.
> It's really sad that we can not come up with a suitable
> time in multiple rounds of poll. :(
> I'd suggest let's go ahead with
> Friday, 05:00 - 06:00 hrs. UTC
> for now and we'll see more based on participation.
+1 to this, can anyone please change the meeting calendar invite?
A part of the paucity of presence might be linked to the content/focus
of the meeting. Over the period of time the APAC meeting has been
organized, the thrust of the agenda has not changed by a large margin.
The world around us has changed enough to require a thinking through
of the focus - if the "why we need" is sticky, the "I have to make
time to participate" is a natural consequence.
What would be the discussions/topics which I'd find worthy of the
collective time of the group? In no order of importance - how to
assess the presence and coverage of Fedora project/sub-projects across
APAC; - where are we absent or, present in very small numbers; - what
can we do to increase the participation from those regions; - what
kind of technology sub-cultures exist across the region and how can
Fedora assimilate well into those sub-cultures etc