Max, as for me: i have an account in FAS, i have a personal page in
Fedora-Wiki, but i write to the fedora-list very seldom, but i always
reading it.
Am i inactive?
I prefer to work with people to sitting in the mailing list and
discussing questions.
But, of course i agree with you.
19.02.2009, в 14:34, Max Spevack написал(а):
The purpose of this email is to try to lay out a roadmap for
solving, once and for all, the question of inactive Fedora
Ambassadors.
GOALS OF IDENTIFYING INACTIVE AMBASSADORS:
(1) Housekeeping. All projects need to have their membership
rosters pruned from time to time. In Ambassadors, this is
particularly important because non-Fedora people might get in touch
with Ambassadors, and if they don't receive a response, it looks
like Fedora is ignorning them. Other sub-projects for which
identifying inactive ambassadors are crucial is packaging. If
someone drops off the face of the earth, their packages need to be
given to a new owner.
Pages that need to a "refresh" policy:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/CountryList <-- I argue
that CountryList is the wrong name for this page, and it should be
called Directory.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/MembershipService/Verification
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Count <-- why do we even
need this page? Doesn't the CountryList page serve the same purpose?
How often are these pages currently updated? Is the process manual
or automated, or a mixture of both?
(2) Give a more prominent location to the "list of ambassadors per
country". That page should be the most visited page in all of
Fedora Ambassadors. People who are trying to find out about Fedora
should be visiting it, and Ambassadors who are looking for other
Fedora folks near them should be visiting it.
We should have something on
fedoraproject.org that says "are you
interested in Fedora? Find a Fedora Ambassador near you to give you
some information" and you type in your location, and it spits back a
list of Ambassadors near you.
(3) In order for any of (2) to be successful, we need to make sure
that the people who are listed as Ambassadors are actually paying
attention to the Ambassadors part of Fedora. If someone is not, it
doesn't mean that they are a bad person -- it just means that they
don't want to have to deal with organizing events or asking
questions from newbies to the project.
I wouldn't be offended if someone removed me from the Fedora
Infrastructure group in FAS, because *I DON'T DO ANYTHING WITH
FEDORA INFRASTRUCTURE*. It doesn't mean I'm a bad person or not a
Fedora contributor, it just means that I don't participate in that
part of Fedora.
HOW DO WE IDENTIFY ACTIVE AMBASSADORS?
We come up with a policy that is simple, and fair.
An active ambassador is someone who:
1) Has joined the group in FAS.
2) Reads and/or posts on fedora-ambassadors-list.
3) Has a useful, up-to-date personal page on the Fedora wiki.
And does one or more of:
* Attends or organizes an event once in a release cycle.
* Maintains a blog on Planet Fedora, with about one post per month.
* Participates on fedora-list or
fedoraforum.org to help people w/
questions.
* Indicates their willingness to mentor and guide new contributors
or new users.
WHAT DO WE DO WITH INACTIVE AMBASSADORS?
If someone is inactive, we *DO NOT* kick them out of the ambassadors
group in FAS, and we *DO NOT* remove them from fedora-ambassadors
list.
But we should remove them from the "directory of Ambassadors sorted
by country", which I argue again needs to be much more visible and
useful, so that those inactive Ambassadors aren't being asked to do
public-facing things.
When someone re-surfaces or has more time for Ambassadors, we put
them back on the directory.
==================
Flame me.
--Max
--
Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
Fedora-ambassadors-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list