On 03/30/2012 09:50 AM, Scott Seago wrote:
Rather than paste in the entire text, I'm just linking to the
writeup. Please read the whole thing first and if you want to comment
on anything specific, quote it and comment on this thread.
OK I've updated to take into account feedback from Imre, Jan, Jay, and
In particular, we'll allow both LDAP and Local groups to exist
concurrently (subject to config flags, so we can still lock this down to
only one type). I've added consideration of dynamic user group lists
managed via LDAP queries, but in the 'future plans' section, as it will
probably not be included in the initial iteration.
In addition, I've noted that, subject to availability of a scheduling
infrastructure, I'd prefer the background re-sync to inline/blocking