Matt, please, do not take anything I write personally or as an offense.
I started with saying that all these as IMHOs. Most my ideas are based
on my previous experience from outside this project and although I think
that 4 months is enough time to get the idea of Conductor, I surely
don't have much idea about the history of the project, don't know all
the components in much detail and cannot yet understand reasons that led
to previous decisions that might seem strange to me.
I will try to address the points you made one by one, no offense.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:55:09PM -0500, Matt Wagner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:10:47AM +0100, Martin Povolny wrote:Sorry, that is not an argument. It also does not mean that the decision
> >
> > I was not here when this decisions where made and did not hear any
> > reasonable argument why the MQ was removed from the project.
>
> I'm trying to find the mailing list thread, but I think it predates the
> aeolus-devel.
>
> But suffice it to say that a lot of smart people thought about it and
> the community decided it was the right path forward at the time. That's
> not to say that it means we shouldn't consider re-adding it, just that
> your not seeing "any reasonable argument" doesn't mean that the decision
> at the time was wrong.
was right.