On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 19:56 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Oh yes, as Simo pointed out, the other thing about PAM is that
it
> doesn't get us kerberos support - it's not a magic bullet on that
> front.
I am not sure we are talking about same scenario here.
It was simply a warning to others that PAM isn't sufficient for ticket
based kerberos authentication.
It's easy to forget that PAM doesn't do this.
Cheers,
Mark.