Apologies folks, I'm out of pocket for the next couple days and haven't had a
second to organize this vote. It'll be Friday unless someone else wants to organize it
sooner.
-hugh
-------- Original Message --------
From: Justin Clift <jclift(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Wed, 14/11/2012 12:19 PM
To: aeolus-devel <aeolus-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org>
CC:
Subject: Mission Statement - Was Re: Aeolus Developer Conference Report. ACKS REQUIRED BY
NOV 13.
On 14/11/2012, at 3:00 PM, Scott Seago wrote:
<snip>
Hmm. OK, I guess to me it's fairly clear that if we can handle
>1, we can handle 1 too, but I have no real objections to mentioning both, if it can be
done in such a way that everyone agrees to the wording. What is essential, though, is that
we do mention multi-instance systems, since that's a huge part of what we do. In other
words, by all means lets make it clear that we handle "one or more instances" --
but not at the expense of not making it equally clear that we handle complex
multi-instance systems well.
Hmmm, we seem to have started bike-shedding on the mission
statement a while back. ;)
Let's get the list of mission statement candidates written
up, then vote to pick the winner.
+ Justin
--
Aeolus Cloud Evangelist
http://www.aeolusproject.org