>>
> Ugh, where is clalance when we need him? Seriously, how many times do
> we need to rename these things? While not all are neccessarily bad
> (though Deployment => Application is definitely horrible), I am just
> tired of the churn here on naming. How can we expect users to know
> what we are talking about if we constantly are changing our glossary?
While I sympathise with the sentiment, I see this as the final
discussion on the naming matter. After this, the names will be settled
and for better or worse, we'll be stuck with them.
Remember that what's now Aeolus Conductor went through about four
different names. Then we picked one, bought the domain and now it's done.
With the 1.0 getting closer every day, this is probably the only time
we can actually finalize this.
I agree with Jay and clalance on this one.
1.0 or post-1.0 doesn't matter. Products change names all the time.
Domains are dirt cheap.
We only have one shot w/ Aeolus, lets use that to develop a solid
product. Not continuously spin our wheels w/ branding / marketing.
-Mo