On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 07:41:13AM +0100, Martyn Taylor wrote:
+1 from me. Good Stuff.
Also, since there was no final decision made on the patch process. I
would like to propose that if we do move to github then we adopt the
github patch process.
Although I totally agree with you, this is the part of the earlier
discussion that drew some controversy.
I think it will be an improvement, and will make it easier for new
contributors. However, knowing that not everyone is on board, I'm
inclined to say we shouldn't rock the boat too much.
As a counter-proposal, what if we tried this experimentally on a smaller
project, such as aeolus-image? If it worked well, we could come back and
advocate it to the larger group. If not, we've mitigated most of the
potential for harm. (The one thing I want to make sure of here is that
we don't end up with different workflows for each project in the long
run. As a short-term pilot I think it's fine, but long-term it would
just be bewildering.)
Best,
Matt