Re: How to deploy our new jekyll website
by Hugh O. Brock
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:19:34AM +1000, Justin Clift wrote:
> Note - I've removed aeolus-devel from this, because I'm including
> links to internal things.
>
>
> On 27/09/2012, at 3:23 AM, Hugh Brock wrote:
> <snip>
> > I have a radical suggestion I would like to throw out for comment:
> >
> > I was talking to Matt Hicks the other day, of OpenShift, and he claims
> > they are moving *their entire agile setup* to GitHub. Basically they're
> > going to ditch stories in Rally and move them to the GitHub issue
> > tracker instead.
>
> Interesting. As a data point, saw this last night in their recent archives
> while trying to resolve a problem:
[snipped private link]
>
>
> Gives the impression that their GitHub usage varies heaps, which doesn't
> feel in line with a group moving everything to it.
>
I'm just relaying what I heard from Matt Hicks, who is the engineering
lead for OpenShift. I don't think the switch is planned to happen
overnight, but they are heavy users of Rally now, and they are finding
that straddling two tools is bringing more problems than it solves.
But, leaving that aside, what do you guys think about the idea for
Aeolus? I know Redmine has more tracking features than GitHub, but it
feels like we're saddling ourselves with a substantial burden (hosting
an app, manually closing issues after committing code, etc.) that we
could erase simply by moving story tracking to GitHub.
--Hugh
--
== Hugh Brock, hbrock(a)redhat.com ==
== Engineering Manager, Cloud BU ==
== Aeolus Project: Manage virtual infrastructure across clouds. ==
== http://aeolusproject.org ==
"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I’m
not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
--Robert McCloskey
11 years, 7 months
Can we make November 1 the day OpenStack works end-to-end?
by Matt Wagner
Hi folks,
I've been thinking some more about OpenStack and the fact that it's
still not working end-to-end in Aeolus. A lot of people have done a lot
of work to get individual components working, but it's still not all
integrated.
It's been something we've been trying to do for six months, and one of
the few bits of community feedback we've had. The situation is frankly
kind of frustrating.
So I'd like to propose that we draw an arbitrary line in the sand and
say that, one month from today, on November 1 (a Thursday), we will have
OpenStack working end-to-end and all requisite components released. Does
that seem feasible? To my knowledge, that means that we will need to:
1.) See that Deltacloud 1.0.4 is released.
2.) See that Image Factory 1.2 is released.
3.) Implement IME, or if that won't be ready by November 1, update
aeolus-image-rubygem to work with Image Factory 1.2.
While this feels a little bit like an aggressive schedule, this is
something that's already been 6 months in the making. I really think we
need to get this wrapped up soon. Does this seem like a workable plan to
everyone?
-- Matt
11 years, 7 months