>>>> "MH" == Miro HronĨok
<mhroncok(a)redhat.com> writes:
MH> Tibbs (cc'ed) is already looking into packaging the new version for
MH> Fedora in:
MH>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710526
Yes, I have a fork already running 2.0.0-rc (which I've called rc0),
available at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/tibbs/rpms/slic3r-prusa3d
I wouldn't presume to say that it's in the form that the final package
would take, as it mostly conforms to my stylistic preferences and might
need to be altered somewhat before Miro decides its worth merging back
into the
We will of course need to rename the package at some point; there's a
ticket upstream already asking which of "prusa-slicer" or
"prusaslicer"
is preferred by the developers.
MH> I suppose a major drawback would be lot of bundled 3rd party
MH> libraries.
Yes, that is one of the main pieces of work left to do on the package:
see what can be unbundled and make note of the rest.
Other things on the TODO list are:
* Actually do the renaming in rawhide (Fedora's rolling development
branch).
* Figure out how to re-enable the test suite, which is increasingly
important as we try to unbundle things.
* Re-evaluate the architecture exclusion list. It would be nice to
build on at least 64bit ARM.
- J<