I've noticed that the 'ip' keyword in ACI bind rules seems to have no effect on its own. For example,
This does not deny access to IP 1.2.3.4:
aci: (version 3.0; acl "Deny 1.2.3.4"; deny(all) (ip = "1.2.3.4");)
But when combined with a userdn clause like this, it works:
aci: (version 3.0; acl "Deny 1.2.3.4"; deny(all) (userdn = "ldap:///anyone") and (ip = "1.2.3.4");)
Is this known/expected behavior? Just want to make sure I'm interpreting this right.
Thanks a lot, -- George
George Holbert wrote:
I've noticed that the 'ip' keyword in ACI bind rules seems to have no effect on its own. For example,
This does not deny access to IP 1.2.3.4:
aci: (version 3.0; acl "Deny 1.2.3.4"; deny(all) (ip = "1.2.3.4");)
But when combined with a userdn clause like this, it works:
aci: (version 3.0; acl "Deny 1.2.3.4"; deny(all) (userdn = "ldap:///anyone") and (ip = "1.2.3.4");)
Is this known/expected behavior? Just want to make sure I'm interpreting this right.
Looks like it's probably a bug in the aci code.
Thanks a lot, -- George
-- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org