Here is what 00core.ldif looks like (I'm sorry, but this is very foreign
to me; does this look okay)? Thanks again.
Aaron
cat 00core.ldif | more | grep -i passwordMaxrepeats
attributeTypes: ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.2081 NAME ( 'passwordMaxRepeats'
'pwdMaxRepeats' ) DESC 'Netscape defined password policy attribute type'
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 SINGLE-VALUE X-ORIGIN 'Netscape
Directory Server' )
objectClasses: ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.2.13 NAME 'passwordPolicy' DESC
'Netscape defined password policy objectclass' SUP top MAY (
passwordMaxAge $ passwordExp $ passwordMinLength $ passwordKeepHistory $
passwordInHistory $ passwordChange $ passwordWarning $ passwordLockout $
passwordMaxFailure $ passwordResetDuration $ passwordUnlock $
passwordLockoutDuration $ passwordCheckSyntax $ passwordMustChange $
passwordStorageScheme $ passwordMinAge $ passwordResetFailureCount $
passwordGraceLimit $ passwordMinDigits $ passwordMinAlphas $
passwordMinUppers $ passwordMinLowers $ passwordMinSpecials $
passwordMin8bit $ passwordMaxRepeats $ passwordMinCategories $
passwordMinTokenLength ) X-ORIGIN 'Netscape Directory Server' )
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard
Megginson
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:42 AM
To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds
1.0.1 to 1.0.2
Bliss, Aaron wrote:
Is there any easy way that I can verify that the schemas have been
updated properly? Thanks.
Yes. See if your slapd-instance/config/schema/00core.ldif file has
definitions for these attributes:
passwordMinDigits $ passwordMinAlphas $ passwordMinUppers $
passwordMinLowers $ passwordMinSpecials $ passwordMin8bit $
passwordMaxRepeats $ passwordMinCategories $ passwordMinTokenLength
Aaron
-----Original Message-----
From: Bliss, Aaron
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 1:34 PM
To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.'
Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds
1.0.1 to 1.0.2
I believe this is what your looking for, here is an example when I
intentionally attempt to break the password rules:
[13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 RESULT err=19 tag=103
nentries=0 et ime=0
[13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 MOD
dn="uid=awbtest,ou=users,dc=pre ferredcare,dc=org", invalid password
syntax
Here is the error that occurred during the upgrade (I wouldn't worry
too much about the entries below that reference fds1 instead of
al-lnx-s11, I manually typed that after pasting the error log, as I
wasn't comfortable displaying the real server name, but it doesn't
really matter now, the real server name is al-lnx-s11)
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=101
nentries=1 etime=0
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=4 BIND dn="uid=admin,
ou=Administrators, ou=TopologyManagement, o=NetscapeRoot" method=128
version=3
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=5 SRCH
base="cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.
org,
ou=preferredcare.org, o=NetscapeRoot" scope=2
filter="(&(objectClass=nsAppl
ication)(nsNickName=slapd)(nsInstalledLocation=/opt/fedora-ds))"
attrs="* aci pa sswordExpirationTime passwordExpWarned
passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime ac countUnlockTime
passwordHistory passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThrough Limit
nsSizeLimit nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock"
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=4 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0
etime=0
dn="uid=admin,ou=administrators,ou=topologymanagement,o=netscaperoot"
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=5 RESULT err=0 tag=101
nentries=1 etime=0
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=6 SRCH base="cn=Fedora Directory
Server, cn=Server Group,
cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org,
ou=preferredcare.org, o=Netsca peRoot" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)"
attrs="* aci passwordExpirationTime pas swordExpWarned
passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime accountUnlockTime password
History passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThroughLimit
nsSizeLimit nsTime Limit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock"
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=6 RESULT err=0 tag=101
nentries=1 etime=0
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=7 MOD dn="cn=Fedora Directory
Server, cn= Server Group,
cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org,
ou=preferredcare.org, o=NetscapeR oot"
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=7 RESULT err=0 tag=103
nentries=0 etime=0
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=8 SRCH base="cn=Fedora Directory
Server, cn=Server Group,
cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org,
ou=preferredcare.org, o=Netsca peRoot" scope=1
filter="(objectClass=nsDirectoryServer)" attrs="* aci passwordEx
pirationTime passwordExpWarned passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime
accountUnl ockTime passwordHistory passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId
nsLookThroughLimit ns SizeLimit nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole
nsRoleDN nsAccountLock"
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=8 RESULT err=0 tag=101
nentries=1 etime=0
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=9 SRCH
base="cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11, cn=Fedo ra Directory Server, cn=Server
Group,
cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org, ou=prefer
redcare.org,
o=NetscapeRoot"
scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="* aci passw
ordExpirationTime
passwordExpWarned passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime accou
ntUnlockTime passwordHistory passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId
nsLookThroughLim it nsSizeLimit nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole
nsRoleDN nsAccountLock"
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=9 RESULT err=0 tag=101
nentries=1 etime=0
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=10 SRCH
base="cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedo ra Directory Server,cn=Server
Group,cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org,ou=preferred
care.org,o=NetscapeRoot" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="* aci
passwordE xpirationTime passwordExpWarned passwordRetryCount
retryCountResetTime accountUn lockTime passwordHistory
passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThroughLimit n sSizeLimit
nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock"
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=10 RESULT err=0 tag=101
nentries=1 etime= 0
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 RESULT err=19 tag=103
nentries=0 etime =0
[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 MOD
dn="cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server
Group,cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcar
e.org,o=NetscapeRoot", invalid password syntax
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard
Megginson
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:06 AM
To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds
1.0.1 to 1.0.2
Bliss, Aaron wrote:
>I've been able to reproduce; after setting the new password policy
>(require 1 digit, 1 special, etc) and then I attempt to use a password
>that isn't compliant, this error is logged and the users new
password
>is not accepted.
>[13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 RESULT err=19 tag=103
>nentries=0 etime=0
>
>
>
>
Can you find out what this operation is? It's either an ADD or MOD -
just search before that line for "conn=1073 op=10". I'd like to know
what the DN is.
>So, it looks like everything is working like it is suppose to....it's
>still interesting that I received that error during the upgrade....
>
>Aaron
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com
>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bliss,
>Aaron
>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 10:04 PM
>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
>Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from
>fds
>1.0.1 to 1.0.2
>
>It only seems to be in the access log 1 time; looks like it only
>happened during the upgrade
>[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 RESULT err=19 tag=103
>nentries=0 etime=0 Is there an easy way to verify that the new
>password
>
>
>schema is being used?
>
>Thanks.
>Aaron
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com
>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of
>Richard
>
>
>Megginson
>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 9:54 PM
>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
>Cc: Bliss, Aaron
>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from
>fds
>1.0.1 to 1.0.2
>
>Bliss, Aaron wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>>Well, I upgraded the fds rpm; after a reboot all looks okay, however
>>I
>>
>>
>>noticed this information in the setup logfile; is this indicative
that
>>something failed to update properly? Perhaps the new schema
files?
>>How can I verify that the new schema files are in use? Thanks very
>>much.
>>
>>Start Slapd Starting Slapd server reconfiguration.
>>Fatal Slapd ERROR: Could not update Directory Server Instance URL
>>ldap://fds1.preferredcare.org:389/o=NetscapeRoot user id admin DN
>>cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server
>>Group,cn=fds1.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcare.org,o=NetscapeRoot
>>(19:Constraint violation)
>>Configuring Administration Server...
>>InstallInfo: Apache Directory "ApacheDir" is missing.
>>
>>The proper fds version is disaplyed in the display console, and the
>>new
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>password enforcement options seem to be available.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Check your directory server access log - look for err=19 - constraint
>violation - to see which operation it's complaining about.
>
>
>
>
>
>>Aaron
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Bliss, Aaron
>>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM
>>To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server
project.'
>>Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade
from
>>fds
>>1.0.1 to 1.0.2
>>
>>Ah, thanks again.
>>
>>Aaron
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com
>>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of
>>Richard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>Megginson
>>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM
>>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
>>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from
>>fds
>>1.0.1 to 1.0.2
>>
>>Bliss, Aaron wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Thanks; just so I understand, I have to run the setup script even
>>>though my databases have already been configured? I did not have to
>>>do
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>this on my test box in order to upgrade. Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Setup will copy in the new schema files required to use the new
>>password syntax checking, so if you skip that, you'll have to copy
>>them
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>in manually. Setup will also make sure the console reports the
>>correct
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>version of directory server.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Aaron
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com
>>>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of
>>>Richard
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Megginson
>>>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:59 PM
>>>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
>>>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from
>>>fds
>>>1.0.1 to 1.0.2
>>>
>>>Bliss, Aaron wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers
>>>>tonight; do I need to worry about their server
certificates? I'll
>>>>just
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Upgrade shouldn't touch any ssl information.
>>>
>>>After doing the rpm -U, do cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup and
>>>follow
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>the prompts.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Aaron
>>>>
>>>>www.preferredcare.org
>>>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans --
J.
>>>>
>>>>
D.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>>>>Power and Associates
>>>>
>>>>Confidentiality Notice:
>>>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended
>>>>for
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may
>>>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of
>>>this
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>>>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
>>>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
>>>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this
>>>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication
>>>in
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>>>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy
>>>the copies you received.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>>>>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com
>>>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>www.preferredcare.org
>>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J.
D.
>>>
>>>
>>>Power and Associates
>>>
>>>Confidentiality Notice:
>>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may
>>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of
>>this
>>
>>
>>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
>>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
>>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this
>>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication
>>in
>>
>>
>>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy
>>the copies you received.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>--
>>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>>>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com
>>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>www.preferredcare.org
>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D.
>>Power and Associates
>>
>>Confidentiality Notice:
>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for
>>
>>
>>
>>
>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may
>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this
>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this
>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in
>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and
destroy
>the copies you received.
>
>
>
>
>>--
>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com
>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>www.preferredcare.org
>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D.
>Power and Associates
>
>Confidentiality Notice:
>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for
>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may
>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this
>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this
>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in
>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and
destroy
>the copies you received.
>
>
>--
>Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
>
>--
>Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
>
>
>
www.preferredcare.org
"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D.
Power and Associates
Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this electronic message is intended for
the exclusive
use of the individual or entity named above and may
contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information
is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you
received.
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
www.preferredcare.org
"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and
Associates
Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of
the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee
or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone
and destroy the copies you received.