On Thursday 30 July 2009 01:36:15 Rich Megginson wrote:
Roberto Polli wrote:
> On Thursday 30 July 2009 01:15:00 Rich Megginson wrote:
>>> but..is it right that in aclplugin.c the function
>>> acl_get_proxyauth_dn( pb, &proxy_dn, &errtext )
>>> returns proxy_dn = "" ?
>> It is if there is no proxy auth control being sent.
> but tcpdump states it's sent...
Without walking through the server with the debugger, it's going to be
difficult to tell what's going on.
it's the whole day I'm trying that
way ;) hope to discover something.. I
should set thread to 1 to use gdb against slapd
The function acl_get_proxyauth_dn()
is pretty straightforward - look at the request controls, see if version
1 or version 2 of the proxy auth control was sent,
if so, grab the DN
from the control value. There is no obvious place in the code where
acl_get_proxyauth_dn() would be called conditionally (that is, not
called due to some condition).
So I'm at a loss to explain how
acl_get_proxyauth_dn() could be called at all, with a valid proxy auth
control containing a non-empty DN value, and return a NULL or empty DN.
nice answer :P I'll continue to play with it..just hope not to be
silly enough to have some mistake in configs.
Maybe it's worth an rpm -U of the server...
Rich, thank you very much for all your prompt replies. I'll let you know.
Thanks again + Peace,
Babel S.r.l. - http://www.babel.it
Tel. +39.06.91801075 - fax +39.06.91612446
Tel. cel +39.340.6522736
P.zza S.Benedetto da Norcia, 33 - 00040 Pomezia (Roma)
"Il seguente messaggio contiene informazioni riservate. Qualora questo
messaggio fosse da Voi ricevuto per errore, Vogliate cortesemente darcene
notizia a mezzo e-mail. Vi sollecitiamo altresì a distruggere il messaggio
erroneamente ricevuto. Quanto precede Vi viene chiesto ai fini del rispetto
della legge in materia di protezione dei dati personali."