Hi Noriko,
I run it on a CentOS
4.4 box (Linux 2.6.24). I use the db 4.2 libs with all the
patches.
Oh, yes dbverify does
complain a lot. I see for all of the db files messages like:
[20/May/2011:11:03:05
-0400] DB verify - verify failed(-30976):
/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-ID/db/userRoot/cn.db4
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400] - libdb: Page 5: out-of-order
key at entry 2
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400] - libdb: Page 5: out-of-order
key at entry 5
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400] - libdb: Page 5: out-of-order
key at entry 8
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400] - libdb: Page 5: out-of-order
key at entry 10
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400] - libdb: Page 5: out-of-order
key at entry 13
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400] - libdb: Page 5: out-of-order
key at entry 16
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400] - libdb: Page 5: out-of-order
key at entry 19
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400] - libdb: Page 5: out-of-order
key at entry 21
[20/May/2011:11:03:07 -0400] DB verify - verify
failed(-30976):
/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-ID/db/userRoot/parentid.db4
DB verify: Passed
This said, I guess I should re-index the entire db. Any idea, why this is happening?
Right now, I have a 2 MMR
setup, where both masters also have a replication
agreement to a third box, which is a dedicated consumer.
I do run tests, where I perform simultaneously adds and
deletes (not on the same object) on all three boxes. I
just want to verify how replication behaves in 1.2.8.
-Reinhard
Hi Reinhard,
Could you tell me the OS version and Berkeley DB version (rpm -q
db4)?
Could you run "/usr/lib[64]/dirsrv/slapd-ID/dbverify"? Does it
complain anything? Especially, the ancestorid index? If it does,
you may want to re-create the corrupted index...
--noriko
Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Noriko,
I observed one more
item, which does not bother me right now, but you may want
to see:
I am not sure why
and how it happened, but I see the following message on
the supplier:
[18/May/2011:13:59:50
-0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn=supplier2consumer"
(consumer:389): Consumer failed to replay change (uniqueid
aea3731d-808711e0-83d5fdc8-f32b8f3c, CSN
4dd4085b004800040000): Operations error. Will retry later.
And I see the following on the
consumer:
[18/May/2011:13:59:29 -0400] -
idl_new.c BAD 22, err=-30988 DB_PAGE_NOTFOUND: Requested
page not found
[18/May/2011:13:59:29 -0400] - ancestorid BAD 13120,
err=-30988 DB_PAGE_NOTFOUND: Requested page not found
Any idea, what happened there....
Thanks,
-Reinhard
Hi Reinhard,
Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Hi Noriko,
I have to correct
myself. The box which had the import issue was on a
1.2.7.5 system. The other box was running 1.2.8.2.
So, it looks like
you have fixed the issue with 1.2.8.2.
*relieved* Thanks for testing it on 1.2.8.2!
--noriko
Thanks,
-Reinhard
1.2.8.2
-Reinhard
It looks to me you have hit this bug... Which version of
389-ds-base you are running?
Bug 684996 - Exported tombstone
cannot be imported correctly.
The patch should be in the version 1.2.8.2.
Thanks,
--noriko
On 05/17/2011 11:03 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Hi,
I have seen the following:
I set 2 systems up in MMR.
Replication worked. For some reason, I needed to take
one of the boxes out of the replication and disabled
replication. Later on, I enabled it again and created
the shadowing agreement to the other box. Now, I saw
the following errors during the import of the db:
[17/May/2011:11:46:04
-0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
multimaster_be_state_change
: replica o=base is going offline; disabling
replication
[17/May/2011:11:46:07 -0400] - WARNING: Import is
running with nsslapd-db-privat
e-import-mem on; No other process is allowed to access
the database
[17/May/2011:11:46:08 -0400] - import userRoot:
WARNING: Skipping entry "nsuniqu
eid=06869502-7fe011e0-8f589300-7e7b2163,ou=sample,o=base"
which has no parent,
ending at line 0 of file
"(bulk import)"
[17/May/2011:11:46:08 -0400] - import userRoot:
WARNING: bad entry: ID 453
.....
Any idea, what is going on
there?
Thanks,
-Reinhard
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users