I actually tried even a bit more 1+2+4+65536=65543.
I tried to add the object uid=stibbons,ou=admins,o=operator
s,o=UMC.
I tried to add it at (from access file):
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] conn=83 op=51 SRCH base="uid=stibbons,ou=admins,o=o
perators,o=UMC" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs=ALL
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] conn=83 op=51 RESULT err=32 tag=101 nentries=0 etim
e=0
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] conn=83 op=52 ADD dn="uid=stibbons,ou=admins,o=oper
ators,o=UMC"
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] conn=83 op=52 RESULT err=1 tag=105 nentries=0 etime
=0
Here is what you see in errors:
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - mapping tree release backend : userRoot
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - do_search
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - SRCH
base="uid=stibbons,ou=admins,o=operators,o=UMC" scope=0 deref=3 sizelimit=0
timelimit=0 attrsonly=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs=ALL
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => get_ldapmessage_controls
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= get_ldapmessage_controls no controls
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => slapi_control_present (looking for
2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.3)
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= slapi_control_present 0 (NO CONTROLS)
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - mtn_lock : lock count : 1
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - mapping tree selected backend : userRoot
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - mtn_unlock : lock count : 0
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => slapi_reslimit_get_integer_limit() conn=0xfd42c678,
handle=2
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= slapi_reslimit_get_integer_limit() returning NO
VALUE
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => slapi_reslimit_get_integer_limit() conn=0xfd42c678,
handle=1
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= slapi_reslimit_get_integer_limit() returning NO
VALUE
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => compute_limits: sizelimit=2000, timelimit=3600
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - Calling plugin 'ACL preoperation' #1 type 403
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => slapi_control_present (looking for
2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.12)
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= slapi_control_present 0 (NO CONTROLS)
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => slapi_control_present (looking for
2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.18)
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= slapi_control_present 0 (NO CONTROLS)
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - Calling plugin 'Legacy replication preoperation
plugin' #3 type 403
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - Calling plugin 'Multimaster replication preoperation
plugin' #4 type 403
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => slapi_reslimit_get_integer_limit() conn=0xfd42c678,
handle=0
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= slapi_reslimit_get_integer_limit() returning NO
VALUE
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => find_entry_internal
(dn=uid=stibbons,ou=admins,o=operators,o=umc) lock 0
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => dn2entry
"uid=stibbons,ou=admins,o=operators,o=umc"
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => index_read( "entrydn" =
"uid=stibbons,ou=admins,o=operators,o=umc" )
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - indextype: "eq" indexmask: 0x2
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= index_read 0 candidates
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= dn2entry 0
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => dn2ancestor
"uid=stibbons,ou=admins,o=operators,o=umc"
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => dn2entry "ou=admins,o=operators,o=umc"
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= dn2entry f0cdb0
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= dn2ancestor f0cdb0
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= find_entry_internal_dn not found
(uid=stibbons,ou=admins,o=operators,o=umc)
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => send_ldap_result 32:ou=admins,o=operators,o=umc:
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= send_ldap_result
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - mapping tree release backend : userRoot
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - do_add
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - do_add: dn (uid=stibbons,ou=admins,o=operators,o=UMC)
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - slapi_entry_add_values: using an AVL tree to detect
duplicate values
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => get_ldapmessage_controls
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= get_ldapmessage_controls no controls
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - mtn_lock : lock count : 1
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - mtn_unlock : lock count : 0
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - => send_ldap_result 1::Mapping tree node for o=umc is
set to return a referral, but no referral is configured for it
[04/May/2011:17:40:32 -0400] - <= send_ldap_result
[04/May/2011:17:40:33 -0400] - => slapi_reslimit_get_integer_limit() conn=0xfd42c8a8,
handle=3
[04/May/2011:17:40:33 -0400] - <= slapi_reslimit_get_integer_limit() returning NO
VALUE
[04/May/2011:17:40:33 -0400] - => slapi_reslimit_get_integer_limit() conn=0xfd42c790,
handle=3
[04/May/2011:17:40:33 -0400] - <= slapi_reslimit_get_integer_limit() returning NO
VALUE
[04/May/2011:17:40:33 -0400] - => slapi_reslimit_get_integer_limit() conn=0xfd42c678,
handle=3
Let me know what you see.....
Thanks,
-Reinhard
-----Original Message-----
From: 389-users-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Reinhard Nappert
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 5:32 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Referral errors ....
Rich,
I was able to get one box in this situation (not sure, how though). Do you want me do
change some accesslog-levels or errorlog-levels?
Now would be a good time to gather more information
-Reinhard
-----Original Message-----
From: 389-users-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Richard Megginson
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 11:57 AM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Referral errors ....
No replies so far. Does this mean nobody has seen this issue before?
I have not seen this.
Any errors in the errors log?
-Reinhard
From: 389-users-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of
Reinhard Nappert
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 9:44 AM
To: 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [389-users] Referral errors ....
Hi,
I have the following setup:
I have a 2 multimaster replication setup, where both masters also have
a number of shadowing agreements to other consumers. The data gets
replicated to all boxes and there are no issues. When I try to perform
an update on the slaves, it works on all, but one. Meaning, the server
sends back err=10, with the referral to one of the masters and the
client automatically follows the referrals. Unfortunately, it does not
works with one box:
When there is an attempt to write to the db, the server returns an
error-code 1, with the following message:
javax.naming.NamingException: [LDAP: error code 1 - Mapping tree node
for o=base is set to return a referral, but no referral is configured
for it];
This can also be seen in the access file:
[ 26/Apr/2011:05:35:45 -0300] conn=3418 op=13256 ADD dn="o u = test
,o= base "
[26/Apr/2011:05:35:45 -0300] conn=3418 op=13256 RESULT err=1 tag=105
nentries=0 etime=0
When I have a look at the configuration, it looks exactly like the
others: dn: cn="o=Base",cn=mapping tree,cn=config objectClass: top
objectClass: extensibleObject objectClass: nsMappingTree cn: "o=Base"
nsslapd-state: referral on update nsslapd-backend: userRoot
modifiersName: cn=server,cn=plugins,cn=config modifyTimestamp:
20100721202730Z nsslapd-referral: ldap://master-ld01:389/o=Base
nsslapd-referral : ldap://master-ld02:389/o=Base numSubordinates : 1
dn: cn=replica,cn="o=Base",cn=mapping tree,cn=config
nsDS5ReplicaBindDN: cn=replication,cn=config nsDS5ReplicaRoot: o=Base
nsDS5Flags: 0 nsDS5ReplicaType: 2 nsds5ReplicaPurgeDelay: 43200
objectClass: top objectClass: nsDS5Replica cn: replica modifiersName:
cn=Multimaster Replication Plugin,cn=plugins,cn=config
modifyTimestamp: 20110421052744Z nsDS5ReplicaId: 65535 nsState::
//8AAAAAAADLv69NAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALSoAAAAAAAAIAAAAAAAAAA==
nsDS5ReplicaName: 59480b7e-94fb11df-9df8eeea-774385c0
nsDS5ReplicaReferral: ldap://master-ld01:389/o=Base
nsDS5ReplicaReferral : ldap://master-ld02:389/o=Base I was wondering
if someone has seen this kind of issue. Everything looks fine to me
and I can not explain this behavior. Right now, I can not reproduce
this issue. I only see it in this one setup. Thanks, -Reinhard
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users --
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users