I'm not really 100% sure why we didn't put RHEL 6.4 on.  I think it had to do with some RAID hard drive enclosure driver issues and Dell recommended 6.3.  Anyhow, we are running 1.2.1 currently and I suppose we would want to run the latest.  We were looking at some of the docs but hadn't really found anything "step by step" so I thought I'd ask.

Thanks!
Harry Devine
Common ARTS Software Development
AJM-245
(609)485-4218
Harry.Devine@faa.gov



From: Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com>
To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project." <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Cc: Harry Devine/ACT/FAA@FAA
Date: 08/13/2013 03:30 PM
Subject: Re: [389-users] Question about installing on new servers





On 08/13/2013 01:09 PM, harry.devine@faa.gov wrote:

We have 2 new servers that we are bringing into our suite, and we'd like them to eventually take over the current 389-ds role.  We currently have 2 servers that are running 1.2.1 on CentOS 5.7 64-bit, and the 2 new servers are being installed with RHEL 6.3 64-bit.  What we'd ultimately like to see/have happen is:


install 389-ds on the new servers

set up replication to replicate the data from the 2 old servers to the 2 new servers

point the underlying LDAP operations to the 2 new servers

take the 2 old servers out of the mix


Does anyone have any ideas or thoughts on if this is a good plan?  And the best way to accomplish what we'd like to do?


Yes, that should work.

Why not RHEL 6.4?

What version of 389-ds-base are you planning to use?


Thanks,

Harry Devine
Common ARTS Software Development
AJM-245
(609)485-4218

Harry.Devine@faa.gov

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users