On 6/17/21 2:11 PM, Marco Favero wrote:
Ah, I don't have RA rh5-->dr-rh1.
So, I could setup a RA from all multimaster to dr-rh1 to avoid this kind of problems.
I'm not sure to understand. Really, I have a real time RA from rh5 to rh1, and from
rh1 to rh5. So, if I initialize rh1 from rh5, rh1 should still replicates to dr-rh1,
because rh5 is always in synch with rh1...
Administrative task are sensitive and some side effect can impact
replication. When you reinit rh5->rh1, then rh1 can still replicates to
dr-rh1. However a side effect of reinit is that it clears the changelog
of rh1. So if dr-rh1 is late, then rh1 having lost history of old
updates (changelog reset) is able to connect to dr-rh1 but is no longer
able to find in its cleared changelog, the old update it should start
replication from.
The workaround is to give rh5 a chance to directly update dr-rh1.
thanks
thierry
Thank you
Marco
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproje...
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure