On 08/01/2011 09:41 PM, Penedo wrote:
On 2 August 2011 12:42, Rich Megginson<rmeggins(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> On 08/01/2011 07:54 PM, Penedo wrote:
>> Does the requirement for a payment for the replication feature mean
>> that I should start looking elsewhere for my LDAP needs, if I want to
>> stick to FOSS CentOS and robust LDAP solutions? Or will the people in
>> this forum keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version?
> We will keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version. We will
> continue to provide binaries for Fedora/EPEL.
Would this include multi-master, as it is now or another implementation?
Yes. The
separate ds-replication package is only for RHEL and RHDS
customers.
Thanks again,
--Amos