Anyone know if this has been fixed yet?
Simply Circus, Inc.
86 Los Angeles Street
Newton, MA 02462
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Rob Crittenden <rcritten(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Brett Dikeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Leo Pleiman<lpleiman(a)salsalabs.com> wrote:
>> Rumor has it there has been a mass exodus from Centos and the ports may be
>> a little behind. You might want to look at Scientific Linux.
> I just tried SL 6.1. I did a 'basic server' clean install.
> The epel-389-ds-base repo (as recommended here
) contains a URL
> which doesn't work (it's based off of $releasever, which on SL 6.1
> is...6.1, not "6"! RHEL 6.1 has been out since May, it'd be nice if
> this was fixed.)
Keep in mind this is the EPEL repo and not the SL repo.
> The URL in the file also isn't correct for the testing repo; it's
> trying to access:
> ...and the correct URL, based on browsing the site in question, is:
> Amazingly, finally, it all seems to have installed.
> 389 users mailing list
389 users mailing list