On 07/03/2014 03:58 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 07:27:51 -0600
Rich Megginson <rmeggins(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/02/2014 08:13 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
>> I'd also like to know if anyone has anything specific they could share about
>> the intended release date of 126.96.36.199. I understand that it's a case of
>> "When It's Ready", but I was hoping to know if the fact that all
>> tickets in the Trac milestone for it are closed now indicates that "When
>> It's Ready" will be soon. :-)
> It depends on what platform you are on.
> If you are on RHEL6, your best bet is to just use the 389-ds-base package
> that comes with the base OS. The copr/fedorapeople repos are only used if
> you require to be on the "bleeding" edge and cannot or do not want to wait
> for your particular bug/feature to show up in the 389-ds-base package in the
> base OS.
> If you are on RHEL5, then we'll see what we can do.
We're actually on CentOS 6. We'd be happy to use the standard distro version,
but we're seeing a lot of crashes (about half a dozen or so a day; we've got
Puppet set up to check every five minutes and restart if it's down). We're not
absolutely sure that our problems are caused by the bugs fixed in 188.8.131.52,
but we want to try rolling out the fixes as soon as possible to see if it
alleviates the problems.
Would you be willing to build from source?
>> I'm specifically asking because we have been seeing a lot
of crashes on our
>> LDAP system. The coredumps we sent through resulted in some tickets that
>> have been fixed as part of 184.108.40.206, so we're hoping that the upgrade
>> would make our systems more stable.
> Which tickets are these?
is the ticket I reported, but nhosoi
as a related ticket, and
seems to be affecting us as well.
Looks like these are due for RHEL 6.6 . . .