--
Mitja Mihelič
ARNES, Tehnološki park 18, p.p. 7, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia
tel: +386 1 479 8877, fax: +386 1 479 88 78
On 26. 02. 2015 15:18, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/26/2015 06:30 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We have a provider/consumer (master/slave) setup and we wish to
> create a database backup on the master.
> Replica setting on the master are set to "Single Master".
>
> But when I run
> .../db2bak $backup_path/$current_date
> Backup fails an the following error is written in the errors log:
> ERROR: Standalone db2bak is not supported when a multimaster
> replication enabled server is coexisting.
> Please use db2bak.pl, instead.
>
> Since multimaster replication is not used, should I consider this a bug?
> Or is it referring to the "Single Master" setup as a multimaster setup?
Yes. "Single Master" is a misleading term as it implies that there is
some sort of special protocol or setting that prevents having multiple
masters. There is no such thing.
What version of 389-ds-base? rpm -q 389-ds-base.
We are using latest from CentOS
repo 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-48.el6_6.x86_64.
There are no such problems with the old centos-ds-base-8.2.8-2.el5.centos.
I've browsed the dse.ldif and found the entry defining the replication
(certain entries omitted):
dn: cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dcompany\2Cdc\3Dcom,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
objectClass: nsDS5Replica
objectClass: top
nsDS5ReplicaRoot: dc=company,dc=com
nsDS5ReplicaType: 3
nsDS5Flags: 1
nsDS5ReplicaId: 47
nsds5ReplicaPurgeDelay: 604800
cn: replica
...
I have found the following in the RHDS docs:
"nsDS5ReplicaType: 3" - 3 for both single and multi-master suppliers
(read-write replicas)
From this I would surmise that it does not matter if I choose the
single- or multimaster, nsDS5ReplicaType is set to 3. And db2bak will
not work.
Would this be about right?
Regards, Mitja
>
> Regards, Mitja
>
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users