My apologies for the delay but thank you AI and William, this is great info, I appreciate it.
I'm having good success building a Docker image using the 4teamwork github repo! I'm presenting Monday to the team but I think it will be an easy sell as at least in testing it's working well:
Hi Morgan,
in our case we have ~60 000 entries, ~10 000 accounts and ~5 000 large groups (some containing almost all users). Three 389ds in active-active replication, extremely stable, performant, no problems at all. We are using RHEL 9 clones (Oracle Linux or Alma Linux), latest OS patches (9.4 i think). 389ds version 2.5 compiling from git branch (i think the latest one is 2.5.1, maybe it is available as rpm). No complaints at all :)
Regards,
AI
----- Mail original -----
> De: "Morgan Jones"
> Envoyé: Mercredi 5 Juin 2024 22:25:14
> Objet: [389-users] advice on 389 in production
> Hello Everyone,
>
> What operating system and 389 version is everyone running in production? We are
> finally updating our CentOS 7 servers in earnest.
>
> We have almost 200,000 users and use 389 for our central ldap so stability is
> preferred over features.
>
> Based on release dates I'm leaning toward version 2.x.
>
> I've sent the afternoon trying to find packages for Rocky Linux 9 with limited
> success.
>
> We switched to Ubuntu a few years ago so that would be my preference but I don't
> see packages for ubuntu and I'd prefer to now maintain my own packages.
>
> Is Docker a viable option for a production install? I see there is an up to
> date image which I've been able to start but it appears to be 3.x (see above
> re: preferred production version).
>
> Thanks,
>
> -morgan
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> List Archives:
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
--
_______________________________________________