For clarity are you planing to use samba 3 or 4?
There is a huge difference between the two mainly samba 4 has its own
kerberos 5 server (its a embedded fork of Heimdal).
This muddies the water a bit when talking about samba 4 because while
on pure technical merits I think Heimdal Kerberos 5 is superior
implementation when compared to MIT Kerberos 5, RedHat and Most other
Distributions have standardized on MIT Kerberos 5. Note you can get
MIT Kerberos to work with Samba 4 but it breaks some of the
compatibility with samba and the windows Kerberos Client.
As a result the answer is very different depending on which one you
plan to use and if you plan to use FreeIPA or not.
2012/5/3 Alberto Suárez <asuapaz(a)gobiernodecanarias.org>:
I think I have succeded in setting up 389ds on Centos 6.2. Now I would like
to integrate samba with 389. Is there any documentation available that
explains how to do it?
389 users mailing list