Yeah -- So what I did is drop cacert.asc under /tmp/ldap/certs for testing purposes. I then added a line "TLS_CACERTDIR /tmp/ldap/certs" to /etc/openldap/ldap.conf. The logs on the directory server (and from adding a -d 1 option to ldapsearch) indicated that the client was rejecting the certificate. So I used certutil with cacert.asc to create the cert8.db and key3.db files under /tmp/ldap/certs (I now have cacert.asc, cert8.db, key3.db, and secmod.db under that directory). Same result. Then I went back to /etc/openldap/ldap.conf and set "TLS_REQCERT never", and commented out the cacertdir directive. With that configuration, ldapsearch works with the -ZZ options. So for some reason, it isn't liking my CA cert, and I'm not sure why.
Did you install ca.cert on system and setup /etc/openldap/ldap.conf ?
Greg.28 wrz 2012 05:11, "Kyle Flavin" <email@example.com> napisał(a):--Hi, I've been struggling to setup 389 Directory server with Start TLS.
I have a multi-master replication working with four server. From an external client running openldap's ldapsearch, I'm trying to do the following:
ldapsearch -ZZ -x -h "myserver" -b "dc=example,dc=com" -D "cn=Directory Manager" -W ""
I get an unsupported protocol error on servers that do not have certificates installed.
In an attempt to resolve this, I tried to install a self-signed cert. I created a ca.cert and a server.crt, and imported them into the Directory Server. I then imported the ca.cert to the admin server. When I attempted to import the same server.crt to the admin server, I got an error message stating the certificate was for another host. Since the admin server and directory server reside on the same host, if I generate a new request, it will have an identical host name (I'm not sure if that's relevant to my issue). After all of that, I now receive a "Connect Error SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed". I'm guessing I need to import the root cert onto the client somehow, but I'm not sure how to go about doing that.
This has become pretty time consuming, so I was hoping that someone more knowledgeable could confirm that I'm at least travelling down the right path. I've been following this Red Hat document:
389 users mailing list
389 users mailing list