Hi Russel,

Le 18 avril 2012 23:06, Russell Beall <beall@usc.edu> a écrit :
On Apr 18, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Yeah, this particular operation has not been optimized.  I believe SunDS added explicit optimizations for this particular case.

It is becoming painfully apparent as I write more detailed tests.  389 takes time to add or delete uniquemember values proportionate to the number of values being operated on and is using about twice as much time to delete as it does to add.  Sun DS appears to have perhaps an almost O(1) algorithm in play on both adding and deleting values.

Is there perhaps some kind of referential integrity setting that is being used and forcing some kind of lookup of each value, one that we could perhaps turn off?  We wouldn't need such a check because our metadirectory process handles the integrity/consistency checking already.

There is memberOf plugin that maintains the memberOf attribute for groups. I don't know whether  it is activated by default or not. You could try to disable it. There is also referential integrity plugin, attribute uniqueness plugin, maybe USN plugin or custom indexes that could consume a lot of CPU. Make sure you've disabled them if you don't need them.