Hi Rich, hi Robert,
On 18/05/16 15:48, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 05/18/2016 07:35 AM, Robert Viduya wrote:
> I have no issues with that.
Can you open a 389 ticket?
https://fedorahosted.org/389/newticket
> I’m a little concerned about the ldap message id, however.
Me too. Developers, LDAP SMEs, please feel free to chime in.
this is quite an interesting approach and it will probably work in the
vast majority of cases.
But instead of adding a separate LDAP _operation_ to the stream (where
we cannot easily ensure uniqueness of the message id) we could implement
the "LDAP Session Tracking Control" from
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wahl-ldap-session and only insert that
_control_ into the first LDAP operation.
There is already a 389 ticket for the server side functionality
(
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47873).
On the F5 there is ASN1::element which makes construction of the control
and adding it to the LDAP operation quite feasible.
Regards,
J.