On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Penedo <penedo@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2 August 2011 09:17, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com> wrote:
> So, to summarize, if you want the full 389 ds/admin/console on EL6:
> 1) you must use EL 6.1 or later
> 2) you must use 389-ds-base from the fedorapeople.org repo
> 3) you must use EPEL6 for the other packages

Thanks for the summary. This should probably be copied into the
Wiki/FAQ section, IMHO.

Does the requirement for a payment for the replication feature mean
that I should start looking elsewhere for my LDAP needs, if I want to
stick to FOSS CentOS and robust LDAP solutions? Or will the people in
this forum keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version?

389's multi-master replication and general stability are a killer
feature from my perspective.

sure, I can add this is the FAQ.  I am surprised that 389 has such issues in rhel6, I thought it was only Redhat Directory Server (the paid supported version of 389) that would have extras and optional features.