On 08/05/2011 12:36 PM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:

Trying to install 389-ds-base from your repo on SL 6.1  x86_64 and getting:

$ sudo yum install 389-ds-base --enablerepo=epel-testing
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Setting up Install Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package 389-ds-base.x86_64 0: will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: 389-ds-base-libs = for package: 389-ds-base-
--> Processing Dependency: libslapd.so.0()(64bit) for package: 389-ds-base-
--> Running transaction check
---> Package 389-ds-base-libs.x86_64 0: will be installed
--> Processing Conflict: 389-ds-base- conflicts selinux-policy-base < 3.9.7-11
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: 389-ds-base conflicts with selinux-policy-targeted
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

Installed Packages
Name        : selinux-policy-targeted
Arch        : noarch
Version     : 3.7.19
Release     : 93.el6_1.2
Size        : 2.8 M
Repo        : installed
From repo   : sl-security
Summary     : SELinux targeted base policy
URL         : http://oss.tresys.com/repos/refpolicy/
License     : GPLv2+
Description : SELinux Reference policy targeted base module.

My selinux policy too new?
No.  The problem is that doesn't work.  Try the latest 1.2.9.x from the testing repo.

Aaron Hagopian

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com> wrote:
On 08/01/2011 09:41 PM, Penedo wrote:
> On 2 August 2011 12:42, Rich Megginson<rmeggins@redhat.com>  wrote:
>> On 08/01/2011 07:54 PM, Penedo wrote:
>>> Does the requirement for a payment for the replication feature mean
>>> that I should start looking elsewhere for my LDAP needs, if I want to
>>> stick to FOSS CentOS and robust LDAP solutions? Or will the people in
>>> this forum keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version?
>> We will keep maintaining a fully-functional open-source version.  We will
>> continue to provide binaries for Fedora/EPEL.
> Would this include multi-master, as it is now or another implementation?
Yes.  The separate ds-replication package is only for RHEL and RHDS

-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users