I am trying to build on 7.0 beta, but I am going to actually build on 6.2 as well. Yes BSD does have nss and nspr (as separate packages), and both are installed already, I just have to put the location with the config option as well as the sasl library. I think I am going to go with the source rpms from that location just to make sure I have the proper versions.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rich Megginson" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Jared B. Griffith" <email@example.com>, "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2007 6:44:52 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Announcing Fedora DirectoryServer 1.1Beta
Jared B. Griffith wrote:
> I am trying to build the beta version on Free BSD, but I am getting
> the following error
> The LDAPSDK version in -I/usr/local/include/ldap-standard.h
> The ldapsdk version is ldapsdk-1998.12.31_1
> I remember seeing here that the rpm is only available in the latest
> redhat or fedora. Can someone give me the name of the source rpm
> package so that I can try building this?
> Is the ldapsdk even necessary?
Yes, it is definitely necessary. What version of Free BSD? Does that
have Mozilla nspr and nss, as separate packages (i.e. not bundled witih
Firefox) with the headers? If not, you'll have to start with nspr and nss:
mozldap (Mozilla LDAP SDK) also requires cyrus-sasl, which I assume is
The mozldap source code is here -
If you would rather have a source RPM, you can get the mozldap source
rpm from any fedora mirror e.g.
The srpms for the other components (nspr, nss, etc.) are also available
from the same location.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Megginson" <email@example.com>
> To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project."
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 6:11:53 AM (GMT-0800)
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Announcing Fedora
> DirectoryServer 1.1Beta
> Anthony Giggins wrote:
> >> Richard Megginson wrote:
> >> No, probably not. configure && make is pretty easy. However, if
> > there
> >> is enough hue and cry from the developer community, we will consider
> > it.
> > Silly question where can I download the sources It not obvious to me
> > where they are on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/
> They are not in sources, but you can extract them from the source RPMs
> e.g. here is the srpm for the fedora-ds-admin package -
> use rpm2cpio file.src.rpm | cpio -i
> to extract the source .tar.bz2 from the srpm.
> > --
> > Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> > Fedorafirstname.lastname@example.org
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> - Thank you,
> - Jared B. Griffith
> - Farheap Solutions, Inc.
> - Lead Systems Administrator
> - California IT Department
> - Email - email@example.com
> - Phone - 949.417.1500 ext. 266
> - Cell Phone - 949.910.6542
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
- Thank you,
- Jared B. Griffith
- Farheap Solutions, Inc.
- Lead Systems Administrator
- California IT Department
- Email - firstname.lastname@example.org
- Phone - 949.417.1500 ext. 266
- Cell Phone - 949.910.6542