Agreed, BUT how do I do this with features of Task Invocation Via LDAP
if it is not part of the core product?
David M. Partridge
Tangible Software Inc.
Sr. Security Engineer
2010 Corporate Ridge
McLean, Virginia 22102
Office 800-913-9901 x 3001
From: Rich Megginson [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 9:29 AM
To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Proposed new features for 1.3
David Partridge wrote:
> Would like to see additional monitoring flexibility for snmp - when
configuring multiple ds instances with same port on single multihomed
monitoring information is agregated by port in the monitoring not by
instance and port.
> Please provide more information on deprecation of certmap.conf.
flexibility to not rely on dn in cert mapping to anything in
rely on successful tls mutual authentication and truststore
> Script to provide index analysis based on data in the directory to
provide the following info:
> Search performance efficiency of index and index type based on
limits, and scanidslistlimit.
> Compressed ldif(gzip) capability for export, import, and
A follow up to this - directory server can import from stdin and
to stdout, so you can do this:
db2ldif -n userRoot -a - | gzip > db.ldif.gz
gunzip -c db.ldif.gz | ldif2db -n userRoot -i -
For initialization usage, I guess that would mean online init (or
bulk load using ldapmodify -B). In that case, since the data is BER
encoded already, it would be better to investigate attribute value
compression, as discussed elsewhere in this thread.
> Dave Partridge
> Sent from my Windows Mobile(r) phone.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Megginson <rmeggins(a)redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 7:23 PM
> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Proposed new features for 1.3
> Andrey Ivanov wrote:
>> I continue with my list
> Thanks - I've added many of these to the list - questions below.
>> * the server should be able to return the members of dynamic groups
>> "on the fly" as if it were real members, the membership attribute
>> should be configurable - uniqueMember, member or another
> I put this on the Future list:
> Dynamic group expansion
> * Define a dynamic group, and have the member/uniqueMember
> of this group automatically be populated by the server
> * clients can then just search for member like with a regular
> posix group
>> * support of other virtual attributes generated "on the fly"
> Can you explain this a little more?
>> * pam passthrough plug-in should take into account at least the
>> account activation/desactivation (bug *470684*
). There is a
>> comment about some additional useful features it in th README file
>> this plug-in :
>> We need to worry about account expiration or lockout e.g. the
>> credentials are valid but the user has been locked out of
>> account, or the password has expired, or something like that. Some
>> this can be handled by LDAP e.g. returning password policy control
>> values when the password has expired.
>> * a way to synchronise the configuration of indexes (each time we
>> an index on one of the replicated servers we need to make it
>> on all the others) and some other parameters in
>> the replicated servers (a little like the "configuration"
>> in active directory), the schema changes are already
>> is very good
> I'm calling this feature "Configuration replication" - I think it
> be useful for other sorts of configuration.
>> * enforced attribute syntax validation
> Already on the list - Syntax validation checking
>> * re-verify and validate conformance of the syntaxes, case
>> and their matching rules to RFC
> Already on the list
>> * unix socket autobind still does not seem to work (ldapi) -
>> It could be very useful for various maintenance scripts running on
> We tested this with 1.2.0 and it seems to work. You tested a build
> source? Did you use --enable-autobind with configure? Did you
> the server after configuring your autobind and sasl mapping?
>> * verification of the server from the viewpoint of memory leaks. Th
>> size of the memory used by the server grows with time (normally we
>> don't restart the sevrr during several months, so i can follow the
> We regularly run the server test suite with valgrind enabled. I'm
> aware of any per connection or per operation leaks. What
> you seeing?
>> * logconv.pl - very useful script, add some more options/
>> (for example, a switch to hide unindexed searches in verbose
>> use it as logwatch.
>> * a perl script to show the replication statistics (there is one
>> the we page generation statistics, something more basic,
>> would be very welcome) in text mode - to receiveth reports by mail
>> once per day like logwatch for example
> What sort of information are you looking for? ldapsearch can
> most of the useful information.
>> * regular expressions in ACIs (i know, it is very difficult to do,
>> maybe somewhere in the timescale of the version 10.0 ? :)) -
>> example, allow a user to add or modify a value just in case the new
>> value mathes the regex. Or the group or dn of the user matches the
> You can do some of that currently with targetattrfilters - see
> We added support in 1.2.0 to allow you to specify group membership
> LDAP search specifications, which does allow some wildcarding,
> might help too.
>> * simplify the creation of new syntaxes and their validation/
>> enforcement (version 11.0? :))
> Can you elaborate?
>> * virtual views allowing to map not only the trees but also the
>> attributes ('cn' instead of 'uid' in a subtree, for example)
> Can you elaborate?
>> * enable regex in certmap.conf for mapping the CNs of the
>> during the certificate authentification of users
> This is on the list as
> Get rid of certmap.conf - use SASL mapping (cert auth is really just
> The sasl mapping code uses regular expressions
>> Other than that i just want to emphasize the great job you are
>> adding new features and especially the fantastic reactivity
>> some critical server bugs (usually it takes only one or two
>> have the necessary diff in bugzilla!)
>> Thank you and please continue the development of this directory
> And thank you for your suggestions.
>> Thanks - I've added these notes to
>> Anyone else? C'mon - surely you have an opinion about a
>> Thanks for all your hard work on this!
>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> This e-mail and any attachment is intended for the above name
recipient(s) only and may contain confidential or privileged
If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender and
the message. Failure to maintain the confidentiality of this e-mail
any attachment may subject you to penalties under applicable law.
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information or otherwise be protected by
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
This e-mail and any attachment is intended for the above name recipient(s) only and may
contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient,
please notify the sender and delete the message. Failure to maintain the confidentiality
of this e-mail and any attachment may subject you to penalties under applicable law.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole
use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information
or otherwise be protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.