Hi Noriko,
I run it on a CentOS 4.4 box (Linux 2.6.24). I use the db
4.2 libs with all the patches.
Oh, yes dbverify does complain a lot. I see for all of the
db files messages like:
[20/May/2011:11:03:05 -0400] DB verify - verify
failed(-30976):
/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-ID/db/userRoot/cn.db4
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400]
- libdb: Page 5: out-of-order key at entry 2
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400]
- libdb: Page 5: out-of-order key at entry 5
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400]
- libdb: Page 5: out-of-order key at entry 8
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400]
- libdb: Page 5: out-of-order key at entry 10
[20/May/2011:11:03:06
-0400] - libdb: Page 5: out-of-order key at entry
13
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400] - libdb: Page 5: out-of-order key at
entry 16
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400] - libdb: Page 5: out-of-order key
at entry 19
[20/May/2011:11:03:06 -0400] - libdb: Page 5: out-of-order
key at entry 21
[20/May/2011:11:03:07 -0400] DB verify - verify
failed(-30976): /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-ID/db/userRoot/parentid.db4
DB
verify: Passed
This said, I guess I should re-index the entire db. Any idea, why this is happening?
Right now, I have a 2 MMR setup, where both masters
also have a replication agreement to a third box, which is a dedicated
consumer. I do run tests, where I perform simultaneously adds and deletes
(not on the same object) on all three boxes. I just want to verify how
replication behaves in 1.2.8.
-Reinhard
Hi Reinhard,
Could you tell me the OS version
and Berkeley DB version (rpm -q db4)?
Could you run
"/usr/lib[64]/dirsrv/slapd-ID/dbverify"? Does it complain
anything? Especially, the ancestorid index? If it does, you may
want to re-create the corrupted index...
--noriko
Reinhard Nappert
wrote:
Noriko,
I observed one more item, which does not bother me right
now, but you may want to see:
I am not sure why and how it happened, but I see
the following message on the supplier:
[18/May/2011:13:59:50 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
agmt="cn=supplier2consumer" (consumer:389): Consumer failed to replay
change (uniqueid aea3731d-808711e0-83d5fdc8-f32b8f3c, CSN
4dd4085b004800040000): Operations error. Will retry
later.
And I see the following on the consumer:
[18/May/2011:13:59:29 -0400] - idl_new.c BAD 22, err=-30988
DB_PAGE_NOTFOUND: Requested page not found
[18/May/2011:13:59:29 -0400]
- ancestorid BAD 13120, err=-30988 DB_PAGE_NOTFOUND: Requested page not
found
Any idea, what happened there....
Thanks,
-Reinhard
Hi Reinhard,
Reinhard
Nappert wrote:
Hi Noriko,
I have to correct myself. The box which
had the import issue was on a 1.2.7.5 system. The other box was running
1.2.8.2.
So, it looks like you have fixed the
issue with 1.2.8.2.
*relieved*
Thanks for testing it on 1.2.8.2!
--noriko
Thanks,
-Reinhard
1.2.8.2
-Reinhard
It looks to me you have
hit this bug... Which version of 389-ds-base you are running?
Bug 684996 - Exported tombstone cannot be imported
correctly.
The patch should be in the
version 1.2.8.2.
Thanks,
--noriko
On 05/17/2011 11:03 AM,
Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Hi,
I have
seen the following:
I set 2
systems up in MMR. Replication worked. For some reason, I needed to
take one of the boxes out of the replication and disabled replication.
Later on, I enabled it again and created the shadowing agreement to
the other box. Now, I saw the following errors during the import of
the db:
[17/May/2011:11:46:04 -0400]
NSMMReplicationPlugin - multimaster_be_state_change
: replica
o=base is going offline; disabling
replication
[17/May/2011:11:46:07 -0400] - WARNING: Import is
running with nsslapd-db-privat
e-import-mem on; No other process is
allowed to access the database
[17/May/2011:11:46:08 -0400] -
import userRoot: WARNING: Skipping entry
"nsuniqu
eid=06869502-7fe011e0-8f589300-7e7b2163,ou=sample,o=base"
which has no parent,
ending at
line 0 of file "(bulk import)"
[17/May/2011:11:46:08 -0400] -
import userRoot: WARNING: bad entry: ID
453
.....
Any idea,
what is going on there?
Thanks,
-Reinhard
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users