On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 13:35 -0700, Richard Megginson wrote:
Leroy Tennison wrote:
> The reason I ask is that the last time I looked at it I was
> disappointed. The features seemed limited and rudimentary. You had
> to configure the context in a local file and there was no way to
> dynamically supply a different one. If there is a more robust
> alternative please let me know, I'd love to try it. If not please
> consider this an enhancement request - the greatest directory server
> in the world isn't of great value if the client support is limited.
> Thanks for any and all replies.
I don't know of any. What are some of the features you would like to
see in pam_ldap: the next generation?
From memory, SuSE has pam_unix2, which does some different things, but
I'm likewise unsure what the original poster is asking for.
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net