Discuss - change to default aci
by William Brown
Hi,
Viktor rightly pointed out that I should discuss the content of: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50641
This change is not obvious due to the design of the default ACI system in lib389 (as a result the diff shows a whole new file). However the changes are limited to ou=People. This allows users to self-write userPassword and legalName, and allows self read to sn and legalName attributes.
These were always intended to be in place, but apparently William of the past didn't write tests to assert these properties - that's why in this change there are now tests to show the behaviours we expect for people.
This was noticed when working on 389-ds-portal, where these behaviours are somewhat important to have!
So to address the obvious question, this only affects *new* deployments that will use sample entries / initialise. Existing deployments on 1.3.x and 1.4.[0,1] will not have their aci's changed. Any install that does a full re-init over the sample entries will obviously discard this content.
These should work with both nsUser and User types as well, thus the tests for both.
I think it's a pretty simple change, and from a usability standpoint it's another small step in making new deployments a bit smoother.
Thoughts/comments? I'd aim to merge this about the 18th of oct, so that's a week for everyone to have their say, and there is always room to revert things later if needed.
Thanks!
--
Sincerely,
William
4 years, 6 months
Updates to 389-ds docker
by William Brown
Sorry it took a few days, there was a delay with some other stuff at suse.
With Matus' comments, I have linked the dockerfile on the hub repo, but we could change the build process if it really causes issues.
You can find the images here. I've taken the RC flag off them, but I still want feedback from people from using these in anger. I'm probably going to redeploy my home 389 to these images today/tomorrow to get some mileage on them.
Any other testers or feedback welcome!
At what point do we say they are "mass-usable" to the public?
--
Sincerely,
William
4 years, 6 months
What is the tier1 pytest mark for?
by William Brown
pytestmark = pytest.mark.tier1
I saw this in a test and curious as to it's function? I'm sure it has one :)
--
Sincerely,
William
4 years, 6 months