[SSSD] [PATCH] Incorrect *.py[co] files placement

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Thu Mar 28 14:54:46 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed 27 Mar 2013 10:15:55 AM EDT, Jakub Hrozek wrote:

> I see, does this guideline apply only for packages that are usable
> on its own (only with python) or python packages in general? I
> still think that it would be a strange guideline to require python
> bindings for libfoo to be names python-libfoo and not
> libfoo-python.
> 

I took this to the Fedora packaging list and they came back with the
preference that we should call it python-sssdconfig. They stopped
short of making a firm decision on the libfoo-python question, but the
conversation is ongoing.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlFUWbYACgkQeiVVYja6o6Pu7QCeOW9yaivuycbY88oHFdBOpedl
/GYAn1bXj2L0RAV8re4pAH2oInnSVzmD
=a8Su
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list