Fwd: Re: software update profile support

George varghese georgooty at gmail.com
Mon Apr 29 12:28:37 UTC 2013


Thank you.
For installing software package,
I try , python setup.py install  in /software folder. But where its lib was
copying ..
 On Apr 29, 2013 5:36 PM, "Roman Rakus" <rrakus at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 04/29/2013 08:13 AM, George varghese wrote:
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "George varghese" <georgooty at gmail.com>
>> Date: Apr 27, 2013 12:31 PM
>> Subject: Re: software update profile support
>> To: <miminar at redhat.com>
>>
>>
>  Hi,
>>
>> I have installed openlmi-provider into my system. After the installation
>> openlmi-privider folder contains some mof and reg files. But missing
>> software reg file . So I don't able to openlmi-mof register this file .
>> my requirement is I want to check software update profile.
>>
> So you have only openlmi-providers package installed? For software
> provider you have to install openlmi-software package also.
>
>>
>> Pleas help me, for the initial set up, hoe to do this,
>> I have used CIMOM is sfcb.
>>
> Quick how to on our wiki can help you: https://fedorahosted.org/**
> openlmi/wiki/Howto <https://fedorahosted.org/openlmi/wiki/Howto>
> We are developing and testing on Fedora distribution. For other
> distributions some parts of set up can be different.
>
> Feel free to join us on IRC: #openlmi @ freenode.
>
> RR
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> George
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:27 PM, George varghese <georgooty at gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>>  Thank you so much.
>>> I have done as per u said. Renamed LMI_Qualifiers.mof to
>>> 00_LMI_Qualifiers.mof file which installed openlmi-providers.
>>>
>>> Error still remains.
>>>
>>> One question LMI_Software reg file missing after the installation of the
>>> openlmi-provider-0.0.20.
>>>
>>> Please suggest me, anything I missed here also please share to me soap
>>> xml
>>> document for testing it via http request.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> George
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> George
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Michal Minář <miminar at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    Hi George,
>>>>
>>>> I presume you are trying openlmi-providers-0.0.20. We already know about
>>>> a problem with sbcb. It failes in compiling mof files with
>>>> dependencies among them in arbitrary order. So in order for
>>>> LMI_Software.mof
>>>> to compile, it must be parsed after LMI_Qualifiers.mof.
>>>>
>>>> Solution:
>>>>      Rename LMI_Qualifiers.mof to 00_LMI_Qualifiers.mof or checkout
>>>> current
>>>>      master branch from our repository.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately this is not the only problem you will face when dealing
>>>> with sfcb.
>>>> The others are crashing interop provider and not working indications. We
>>>> are
>>>> working on them. Jan Šafránek have already solved most of issues [1].
>>>>
>>>> Updated package will be released soon. So for the time being you may try
>>>> to apply patches from sourceforge ticket [1] or test with tog-pegasus.
>>>>
>>>> If you bump into any problem with our providers next time, feel free to
>>>> file a bug
>>>> against them in our bugzilla [2].
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://sourceforge.net/p/**sblim/sfcb-tix/37/<http://sourceforge.net/p/sblim/sfcb-tix/37/>
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**buglist.cgi?quicksearch=**
>>>> openlmi-providers&list_id=**1308951<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=openlmi-providers&list_id=1308951>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Michal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 24.4.2013 11:34, George varghese wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have installed openlmi-provider into my system.
>>>>
>>>> How to test software update via sfcb.
>>>>
>>>> LMI_Software.mof
>>>>
>>>> $ sfcbrepos -f
>>>>
>>>> got following errors.
>>>>
>>>> */usr/local/var/lib/sfcb/**stage/**mofs/root/cimv2/LMI_**Software.**mof
>>>> line
>>>> 556 near true: Implemented is not a known qualifier*
>>>>
>>>> *How to resolve this error?*
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> George
>>>>
>>>> *
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:58 PM, George varghese <georgooty at gmail.com
>>>> >wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Thank you so much for your advice.
>>>>> In my previous mail, there are some unanswered questions..
>>>>> Can you please explain on that too.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> George
>>>>>   On Apr 23, 2013 6:35 PM, "Michal Minář" <miminar at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>    It depends on how much do you want to be profile compliant.
>>>>>> All SMASH profiles are well described in specific documents [1]. There
>>>>>> you can find all
>>>>>> requirements for your providers. If you don't aim for profile-feature
>>>>>> complete
>>>>>> implementation, you may save yourself a lot of time. But users of your
>>>>>> API then
>>>>>> won't know what to expect and how to call your providers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For start, you may check out the code of software provider [2], which
>>>>>> conforms
>>>>>> to software inventory [3] and software update [4] profiles. See the
>>>>>> methods implemented
>>>>>> there and try to do it in your own way. Please, if you find some
>>>>>> inconsistency between profiles
>>>>>> and OpenLMI implementation, let us know by opening a ticket at our
>>>>>> track.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good luck,
>>>>>> Michal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://www.dmtf.org/standards/**profiles<http://www.dmtf.org/standards/profiles>
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/**openlmi/browser/openlmi-**
>>>>>> providers/src/software/<https://fedorahosted.org/openlmi/browser/openlmi-providers/src/software/>
>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>> http://www.dmtf.org/sites/**default/files/standards/**
>>>>>> documents/DSP1023_1.0.1.pdf<http://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP1023_1.0.1.pdf>
>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>> http://www.dmtf.org/sites/**default/files/standards/**
>>>>>> documents/DSP1025_1.0.0.pdf<http://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP1025_1.0.0.pdf>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23.4.2013 14:08, George varghese wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I want to implement Software Update Profile in to my board.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   I have installed openwsman, CIMOM as SFCB , OpenLMI-Provider,
>>>>>> CMPI-base providers,konkretCMPI.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   I read CIM provider document of OpenLMI. Its good document.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   for software update, Have these kind of classes are defined(
>>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/**openlmi/wiki/software<https://fedorahosted.org/openlmi/wiki/software>).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   if we implement a new CIM provider for software update, shall I
>>>>>> derive existing CIM_ classes to my new classes?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   if so, I shall creating a .c and .h file using konkretcmpi tool. In
>>>>>> these classes have some methods..  which method is need
>>>>>> implementation? is
>>>>>> enumclass method?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   I have used mod_wsman apache plugin for openwsman. if have, sample
>>>>>> wsman soap request for software update, please..
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   please advise me for implement this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Regards,
>>>>>>   George
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>>> openlmi-devel mailing listopenlmi-devel at lists.**
>>>>>> fedorahosted.orghttps://lists.**fedorahosted.org/mailman/**
>>>>>> listinfo/openlmi-devel<http://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>>> openlmi-devel mailing list
>>>>>> openlmi-devel at lists.**fedorahosted.org<openlmi-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org>
>>>>>> https://lists.fedorahosted.**org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-**devel<https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> openlmi-devel mailing listopenlmi-devel at lists.**
>>>> fedorahosted.orghttps://lists.**fedorahosted.org/mailman/**
>>>> listinfo/openlmi-devel<http://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> openlmi-devel mailing list
>>>> openlmi-devel at lists.**fedorahosted.org<openlmi-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org>
>>>> https://lists.fedorahosted.**org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-**devel<https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> openlmi-devel mailing list
>> openlmi-devel at lists.**fedorahosted.org<openlmi-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org>
>> https://lists.fedorahosted.**org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-**devel<https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/openlmi-devel/attachments/20130429/0039c00d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the openlmi-devel mailing list