RFC: Consistent UI with Katello

Andy Fitzsimon afitzsim at redhat.com
Tue Apr 3 23:23:15 UTC 2012


On 04/04/2012, at 12:41 AM, Hugh O. Brock wrote:

> I firmly believe non-JS support should continue to be a hard
> requirement for us, both for US Govt. accessibility requirements and
> because it's good coding practice.
> 
> Having said that I am also absolutely certain that we will not have
> scope for that level of change to the Katello UI over the next year,
> given the rest of the issues on the agenda. So I think we'll have to
> live with the difference until then (which is really more or less OK,
> given that we don't really know what shape the combined app will take
> over time).
> 
> Take care,
> --H


+1 to this.

 let's not go backwards with out decision making.    
we need to be ready for both states of user activity and hopefully katello can catch up later down the track.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/aeolus-devel/attachments/20120404/6e76cbf9/attachment.html>


More information about the aeolus-devel mailing list